Graded · 2 contests · 3,306 entries

CFB Week 7 FanDuel ownership: Saturday slate

What the field actually played on the CFB Week 7 FanDuel Saturday slate, next to what we projected before lock. Our misses are shown in full.

October 17, 2026 · Updated October 18, 2026 · After The Timeout

5 games · classic

The slate at a glance

Sport
CFB
Week
Week 7
Site
FanDuel
Format
Classic
Games
5
Teams
CAL, COLO, FRES, HAW, NEB, ORE, SDSU, UNM, UTAH, WAKE
First lock
Sat Oct 17, 10:15 PM ET
Player pool
78 players
Projections
Captured Sat Oct 17, 8:07 PM ET, before lock

Top 12 by real ownership

The chalk: who the field played most

Field ownership is the share of lineups that used each player, from 2 small-field or limited-entry tournament contests, 3,306 entries. Gap is the field minus our projection: green means the field played him more than we expected.

Ours vs the field, 2 small-field or limited-entry tournament contests, 3,306 entries
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Wayshawn ParkerUTAHRB44.6%48.4%+3.8
Gio LopezWAKEQB31.5%46.4%+14.8
Ashten EmoryCALRB43.8%45.0%+1.2
Devon DampierUTAHQB63.3%39.5%−23.8
Carlos HernandezWAKEWR28.3%37.7%+9.4
Jayden MandalFRESQB13.2%26.1%+12.9
Josiah FreemanFRESWR11.3%25.6%+14.3
Anthony ColandreaNEBQB44.9%25.3%−19.6
Scottre HumphreyUNM not in our poolRB-22.9%+22.9
Braden PeganUTAHWR24.5%21.6%−2.9
Dierre Hill Jr.ORERB19.2%21.6%+2.4
Jordon DavisonORERB31.8%18.9%−12.9

10 players where we were furthest off

Our biggest misses

We publish these on purpose. The players the field played far more than we expected, and the ones it passed on.

The field played him more than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Scottre HumphreyUNM not in our poolRB-22.9%+22.9
Javion KinnardSDSU not in our poolRB-17.0%+17.0
Jordan NapierSDSUWR0.8%17.2%+16.4
Jack FoleyWAKEWR2.5%18.0%+15.5
Gio LopezWAKEQB31.5%46.4%+14.8
The field played him less than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Evan StewartOREWR25.8%0.0%−25.8
Kwazi GilmerNEBWR39.4%13.8%−25.6
Devon DampierUTAHQB63.3%39.5%−23.8
Anthony ColandreaNEBQB44.9%25.3%−19.6
Ezekiel AvitFRESWR30.3%11.9%−18.4

Small-field or limited-entry tournament contests · n = 96 players

How our projections held up

We compared our projected ownership with the real field for 96 players across 2 small-field or limited-entry tournament contests (3,306 entries). On average our number was 5.5 percentage points away from the field's. On the 27 players at 10% ownership or more, the average gap was 11.4 points. Across the board the field owned these players 0.1 points less than we projected, on average.

5.5 ptsaverage gap, ours vs the field (96 players)
0.74correlation with real ownership, 1.00 is a perfect match (n = 96)
11.4 ptsaverage gap on the 27 players at 10%+
2small-field or limited-entry tournament contests, 3,306 entries
The grade by contest type
Contest typeContestsEntriesPlayersAvg gapCorr
Small-field or limited-entry tournament23,306965.50.74

We grade a contest type once it has at least 2 contests. Cash games are not used to grade tournament ownership.

What these numbers mean

Average gap is how far our projected ownership sat from the real field, in percentage points, averaged over every player compared. If we had a player at 20% and the field played him at 26%, that player adds a 6-point gap.

Correlation measures whether we had the order right: who the field would play most and least. 1.00 would be a perfect match and 0 would be no relationship at all.

Players compared covers our whole player pool plus anyone the field used that we did not have in it.

The 2 contests behind these numbers
ContestGroupEntriesFeeMax entries
$5K Sat CFB Fight Song ($1K to 1st)small-field or limited-entry tournament1,984$3-
$10K Sat CFB Wishbone ($2K to 1st)small-field or limited-entry tournament1,322$9-
How our fantasy point projections held up

Across 78 players, our point projections missed by 5.2 fantasy points on average (5.1 on players who scored), with a correlation of 0.47 against what they actually scored.

Biggest point misses
PlayerOursActualGap
JaQuail SmithCOLO5.820.6+14.8
Jayden MandalFRES17.94.0−13.9
Carlos HernandezWAKE13.60.0−13.6
Ian StrongCAL13.10.0−13.1
Julian LewisCOLO12.60.0−12.6
By position
PosPlayersAvg missBias
QB98.0−4.6
RB225.0−0.4
WR474.8−1.8

Before the next lock

Get projected ownership for the next slate

Members get projected ownership and points for every player on every slate we cover, lineups tested in contest simulations, and this grade on each one afterwards.

Open the DFS builder

CFB on FanDuel

More slates