Graded · 2 contests · 16,595 entries

CFB Week 9 DraftKings ownership: Main slate

What the field actually played on the CFB Week 9 DraftKings Main slate, next to what we projected before lock. Our misses are shown in full.

October 30, 2026 · Updated October 30, 2026 · After The Timeout

3 games · classic

The slate at a glance

Sport
CFB
Week
Week 9
Site
DraftKings
Format
Classic
Games
3
Teams
BAY, CHAR, KENT, SSU, TUL, UCF
First lock
Fri Oct 30, 7:00 PM ET
Player pool
50 players
Projections
Captured Wed Oct 28, 3:38 PM ET, before lock

Top 12 by real ownership

The chalk: who the field played most

Field ownership is the share of lineups that used each player, from 2 large-field tournament contests, 16,595 entries. Gap is the field minus our projection: green means the field played him more than we expected.

Some field numbers read low. Part of the real ownership here comes from a results source that counts each player in one roster slot only, so a player the field used in more than one slot can show less ownership than he really had.

Ours vs the field, 2 large-field tournament contests, 16,595 entries
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Dru DeShieldsKENTQB68.2%65.9%−2.2
Gavin FreemanBAYWR65.5%65.6%+0.2
Wayne HarrisKENTWR100.0%64.0%−36.0
Jaden BarnesCHARWR42.1%48.3%+6.2
Johnnie DanielsTULRB71.4%44.3%−27.1
Duke WatsonUCFRB31.7%43.9%+12.2
Josh DerryUCFWR2.5%39.1%+36.7
DJ LagwayBAYQB7.1%38.7%+31.6
Keyone JenkinsUCFQB0.3%38.7%+38.4
Henry RutledgeCHARRB24.3%30.0%+5.6
Matt ColemanSSUWR18.1%29.3%+11.2
Onterrio Smith Jr.SSUWR3.4%24.5%+21.1

10 players where we were furthest off

Our biggest misses

We publish these on purpose. The players the field played far more than we expected, and the ones it passed on.

The field played him more than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Keyone JenkinsUCFQB0.3%38.7%+38.4
Josh DerryUCFWR2.5%39.1%+36.7
DJ LagwayBAYQB7.1%38.7%+31.6
Onterrio Smith Jr.SSUWR3.4%24.5%+21.1
Trace JohnsonTULQB2.7%22.5%+19.8
The field played him less than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Derrick EleyCHARWR100.0%13.3%−86.7
Conner HarrellCHARQB100.0%20.9%−79.1
Dawson PendergrassBAYRB53.7%1.6%−52.1
Wayne HarrisKENTWR100.0%64.0%−36.0
Johnnie DanielsTULRB71.4%44.3%−27.1

Large-field tournament contests · n = 58 players

How our projections held up

We compared our projected ownership with the real field for 58 players across 2 large-field tournament contests (16,595 entries). On average our number was 10.3 percentage points away from the field's. On the 21 players at 10% ownership or more, the average gap was 22.4 points. Across the board the field owned these players 0.9 points less than we projected, on average.

10.3 ptsaverage gap, ours vs the field (58 players)
0.63correlation with real ownership, 1.00 is a perfect match (n = 58)
22.4 ptsaverage gap on the 21 players at 10%+
2large-field tournament contests, 16,595 entries
The grade by contest type
Contest typeContestsEntriesPlayersAvg gapCorr
Large-field tournament216,5955810.30.63

We grade a contest type once it has at least 2 contests. Cash games are not used to grade tournament ownership.

What these numbers mean

Average gap is how far our projected ownership sat from the real field, in percentage points, averaged over every player compared. If we had a player at 20% and the field played him at 26%, that player adds a 6-point gap.

Correlation measures whether we had the order right: who the field would play most and least. 1.00 would be a perfect match and 0 would be no relationship at all.

Players compared covers our whole player pool plus anyone the field used that we did not have in it.

The 2 contests behind these numbers
ContestGroupEntriesFeeMax entries
CFB $5K mini-MAX [150 Entry Max]large-field tournament11,890$0.50150
CFB $60K Friday Kickoff [$20K to 1st]large-field tournament4,705$15-
How our fantasy point projections held up

Across 49 players, our point projections missed by 5.4 fantasy points on average (5.6 on players who scored), with a correlation of 0.59 against what they actually scored.

Biggest point misses
PlayerOursActualGap
DJ LagwayBAY11.334.1+22.8
Isaiah EneSSU7.628.7+21.1
Henry RutledgeCHAR9.627.0+17.4
Johnnie DanielsTUL12.627.3+14.7
Tony LivingstonBAY3.216.5+13.3
By position
PosPlayersAvg missBias
QB87.1+0.8
RB137.6+3.2
WR283.9−0.6

Before the next lock

Get projected ownership for the next slate

Members get projected ownership and points for every player on every slate we cover, lineups tested in contest simulations, and this grade on each one afterwards.

Open the DFS builder

CFB on DraftKings

More slates