Graded · 2 contests · 265,161 entries

NBA Oct 20 FanDuel ownership: Tuesday slate

What the field actually played on the NBA Tue Oct 20 FanDuel Tuesday slate, next to what we projected before lock. Our misses are shown in full.

October 20, 2026 · Updated October 20, 2026 · After The Timeout

2 games · classic

The slate at a glance

Sport
NBA
Site
FanDuel
Format
Classic
Games
2
Teams
NY, OKC, PHI, SA
First lock
Tue Oct 20, 7:00 PM ET
Player pool
49 players
Projections
Captured Tue Oct 20, 6:37 PM ET, before lock

Top 12 by real ownership

The chalk: who the field played most

Field ownership is the share of lineups that used each player, from 2 large-field tournament contests, 265,161 entries. Gap is the field minus our projection: green means the field played him more than we expected.

Ours vs the field, 2 large-field tournament contests, 265,161 entries
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
OG AnunobyNYPF/SF/G/F/C34.3%57.5%+23.2
Karl-Anthony TownsNYC/F33.0%56.8%+23.8
Dylan HarperSASG/PG/G/F21.8%56.6%+34.7
Jalen BrunsonNYPG/G/F45.2%55.7%+10.4
Victor WembanyamaSAC/F34.6%52.6%+18.0
Isaiah HartensteinOKCC/F14.9%48.0%+33.1
Josh HartNYSF/PF/G/F/C37.5%46.0%+8.5
Joel EmbiidPHIC/F62.8%39.6%−23.2
Shai Gilgeous-AlexanderOKCPG/G/F47.4%39.4%−8.0
Jalen WilliamsOKCSF/SG/G/F/C33.9%37.6%+3.7
Jaylen BrownPHISF/G/F/C55.3%36.7%−18.6
Stephon CastleSASG/PG/G/F41.4%34.2%−7.2

10 players where we were furthest off

Our biggest misses

We publish these on purpose. The players the field played far more than we expected, and the ones it passed on.

The field played him more than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Dylan HarperSASG/PG/G/F21.8%56.6%+34.7
Isaiah HartensteinOKCC/F14.9%48.0%+33.1
Karl-Anthony TownsNYC/F33.0%56.8%+23.8
OG AnunobyNYPF/SF/G/F/C34.3%57.5%+23.2
Cason WallaceOKCSG/G/F12.1%32.6%+20.5
The field played him less than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Joel EmbiidPHIC/F62.8%39.6%−23.2
Tyrese MaxeyPHIPG/G/F51.7%29.1%−22.6
VJ EdgecombePHISG/G/F42.9%22.2%−20.7
Chet HolmgrenOKCPF/C/G/F40.7%20.7%−20.0
Jaylen BrownPHISF/G/F/C55.3%36.7%−18.6

Large-field tournament contests · n = 53 players

How our projections held up

We compared our projected ownership with the real field for 53 players across 2 large-field tournament contests (265,161 entries). On average our number was 7.8 percentage points away from the field's. On the 23 players at 10% ownership or more, the average gap was 15.1 points. Across the board the field owned these players 0.4 points less than we projected, on average.

7.8 ptsaverage gap, ours vs the field (53 players)
0.80correlation with real ownership, 1.00 is a perfect match (n = 53)
15.1 ptsaverage gap on the 23 players at 10%+
2large-field tournament contests, 265,161 entries
The grade by contest type
Contest typeContestsEntriesPlayersAvg gapCorr
Large-field tournament2265,161537.80.80
Small-field or limited-entry tournament11,218too few contests to grade

We grade a contest type once it has at least 2 contests. Cash games are not used to grade tournament ownership.

What these numbers mean

Average gap is how far our projected ownership sat from the real field, in percentage points, averaged over every player compared. If we had a player at 20% and the field played him at 26%, that player adds a 6-point gap.

Correlation measures whether we had the order right: who the field would play most and least. 1.00 would be a perfect match and 0 would be no relationship at all.

Players compared covers our whole player pool plus anyone the field used that we did not have in it.

The 4 contests behind these numbers
ContestGroupEntriesFeeMax entries
$15K Tue NBA Piggy Bank Shot (Guaranteed Overlay!)large-field tournament226,973$0.05150
$600K Tue NBA Opening Night Shot ($150K to 1st)large-field tournament38,188$15150
Contest 281019330small-field or limited-entry tournament1,218-1
$1.5K Tue NBA Big $2 Double Up (Top 375 Win)cash862$2-
How our fantasy point projections held up

Across 49 players, our point projections missed by 6.8 fantasy points on average (7.0 on players who scored), with a correlation of 0.85 against what they actually scored.

Biggest point misses
PlayerOursActualGap
Andre DrummondNY10.643.8+33.2
Shai Gilgeous-AlexanderOKC44.861.2+16.4
Tyrese MaxeyPHI40.856.3+15.5
VJ EdgecombePHI32.617.3−15.3
Rayan RupertPHI15.20.0−15.2
By position
PosPlayersAvg missBias
C/F87.5+1.6
PF/C/G/F14.4+4.4
PF/G/F/C34.2−0.6
PF/SF/G/F/C18.6−8.6
PG/G/F98.7+1.6
SF/G/F/C97.0−4.8
SF/PF/G/F/C22.0+0.1
SF/SG/G/F/C27.3−7.3
SG/G/F126.6−2.9
SG/PG/G/F25.5+1.9

Before the next lock

Get projected ownership for the next slate

Members get projected ownership and points for every player on every slate we cover, lineups tested in contest simulations, and this grade on each one afterwards.

Open the DFS builder

NBA on FanDuel

More slates