Graded · 2 contests · 2,567 entries

NFL Week 8 DraftKings ownership: TEN @ CIN Showdown

What the field actually played on the NFL Week 8 DraftKings TEN @ CIN Showdown, next to what we projected before lock. Our misses are shown in full.

November 1, 2026 · Updated November 1, 2026 · After The Timeout

1 game · showdown

The slate at a glance

Sport
NFL
Week
Week 8
Site
DraftKings
Format
Showdown (single game)
Games
1
Teams
CIN, TEN
First lock
Sun Nov 1, 1:00 PM ET
Player pool
28 players
Projections
Captured Sun Nov 1, 12:37 PM ET, before lock

Top 12 by real ownership

The chalk: who the field played most

Field ownership is the share of lineups that used each player, from 2 small-field or limited-entry tournament contests, 2,567 entries. Gap is the field minus our projection: green means the field played him more than we expected.

Some field numbers read low. Part of the real ownership here comes from a results source that counts each player in one roster slot only, so a player the field used in more than one slot can show less ownership than he really had.

Ours vs the field, 2 small-field or limited-entry tournament contests, 2,567 entries
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Joe BurrowCINQB75.3%89.6%+14.3
Ja'Marr ChaseCINWR57.1%68.7%+11.6
Chase BrownCINRB52.5%51.8%−0.7
Tee HigginsCINWR45.6%51.4%+5.8
Elic AyomanorTENWR21.0%46.9%+25.9
Wan'Dale RobinsonTENWR34.6%45.2%+10.6
Evan McPhersonCINK42.9%37.6%−5.2
Tony PollardTENRB38.5%28.8%−9.7
Gunnar HelmTENTE20.9%27.9%+7.0
BengalsCINDST38.4%23.7%−14.6
Mike GesickiCINTE38.4%21.9%−16.6
Cam WardTENQB35.0%20.5%−14.5

10 players where we were furthest off

Our biggest misses

We publish these on purpose. The players the field played far more than we expected, and the ones it passed on.

The field played him more than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Elic AyomanorTENWR21.0%46.9%+25.9
Joe BurrowCINQB75.3%89.6%+14.3
Ja'Marr ChaseCINWR57.1%68.7%+11.6
Wan'Dale RobinsonTENWR34.6%45.2%+10.6
Gunnar HelmTENTE20.9%27.9%+7.0
The field played him less than we projected
PlayerPosOursFieldGap
Mike GesickiCINTE38.4%21.9%−16.6
BengalsCINDST38.4%23.7%−14.6
Cam WardTENQB35.0%20.5%−14.5
Joey SlyeTENK24.7%12.7%−11.9
Tony PollardTENRB38.5%28.8%−9.7

Small-field or limited-entry tournament contests · n = 30 players

How our projections held up

We compared our projected ownership with the real field for 30 players across 2 small-field or limited-entry tournament contests (2,567 entries). On average our number was 6.0 percentage points away from the field's. On the 15 players at 10% ownership or more, the average gap was 10.2 points. Across the board the field owned these players 0.1 points less than we projected, on average.

6.0 ptsaverage gap, ours vs the field (30 players)
0.93correlation with real ownership, 1.00 is a perfect match (n = 30)
10.2 ptsaverage gap on the 15 players at 10%+
2small-field or limited-entry tournament contests, 2,567 entries
The grade by contest type
Contest typeContestsEntriesPlayersAvg gapCorr
Small-field or limited-entry tournament22,567306.00.93

We grade a contest type once it has at least 2 contests. Cash games are not used to grade tournament ownership.

What these numbers mean

Average gap is how far our projected ownership sat from the real field, in percentage points, averaged over every player compared. If we had a player at 20% and the field played him at 26%, that player adds a 6-point gap.

Correlation measures whether we had the order right: who the field would play most and least. 1.00 would be a perfect match and 0 would be no relationship at all.

Players compared covers our whole player pool plus anyone the field used that we did not have in it.

The 2 contests behind these numbers
ContestGroupEntriesFeeMax entries
NFL Showdown $150 Dime Package [Just $0.10!] (TEN @ CIN)small-field or limited-entry tournament1,783$0.10-
NFL Showdown $8K Showdown Special [$2K to 1st] (TEN @ CIN)small-field or limited-entry tournament784$12-
How our fantasy point projections held up

Across 27 players, our point projections missed by 7.0 fantasy points on average (9.2 on players who scored), with a correlation of 0.86 against what they actually scored.

Biggest point misses
PlayerOursActualGap
Tee HigginsCIN14.840.5+25.7
Joe BurrowCIN23.245.5+22.3
Tony PollardTEN12.231.7+19.5
Cam WardTEN10.830.3+19.5
Chimere DikeTEN1.518.1+16.6
By position
PosPlayersAvg missBias
DST24.5−0.8
K23.5−0.8
QB220.9+20.9
RB64.2+3.0
TE65.4+4.8
WR98.1+7.6

Before the next lock

Get projected ownership for the next slate

Members get projected ownership and points for every player on every slate we cover, lineups tested in contest simulations, and this grade on each one afterwards.

Open the DFS builder

NFL on DraftKings

More slates